Jami` at-Tirmidhi 872

جامع الترمذي#872Sahih

حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ أَبِي عُمَرَ، وَنَصْرُ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ، قَالاَ حَدَّثَنَا سُفْيَانُ بْنُ عُيَيْنَةَ، عَنْ أَبِي إِسْحَاقَ، نَحْوَهُ وَقَالاَ زَيْدُ بْنُ يُثَيْعٍ ‏.‏ وَهَذَا أَصَحُّ ‏.‏ قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى وَشُعْبَةُ وَهِمَ فِيهِ فَقَالَ زَيْدُ بْنُ أُثَيْلٍ ‏.‏

Zaid bin Uthai said:(Another chain) and they said: "Zaid bin Yuthai" and this is more correct

Scholarly Authentication

The label above is the grade most of these scholars gave, each scholar counted once — one dissenting opinion no longer speaks for all of them. If any scholar calls a narration fabricated, that verdict is shown instead, whatever the others say. When they judged only its chain of narrators (“Isnaad”), the label says “Sound chain”. Each scholar's own wording:

Al-AlbaniSahih
Zubair Ali ZaiSahih

Our source also lists this ruling under Ahmad Muhammad Shakir, the editor of the printed edition it was taken from. It is al-Albani's ruling printed again, so it is counted once.

In-book reference: 9:65