Jami` at-Tirmidhi 49
جامع الترمذي#49Sahihحَدَّثَنَا قُتَيْبَةُ، وَهَنَّادٌ، قَالاَ حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الأَحْوَصِ، عَنْ أَبِي إِسْحَاقَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ خَيْرٍ، ذَكَرَ عَنْ عَلِيٍّ، مِثْلَ حَدِيثِ أَبِي حَيَّةَ إِلاَّ أَنَّ عَبْدَ خَيْرٍ، قَالَ كَانَ إِذَا فَرَغَ مِنْ طُهُورِهِ أَخَذَ مِنْ فَضْلِ طَهُورِهِ بِكَفِّهِ فَشَرِبَهُ . قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى حَدِيثُ عَلِيٍّ رَوَاهُ أَبُو إِسْحَاقَ الْهَمْدَانِيُّ عَنْ أَبِي حَيَّةَ وَعَبْدِ خَيْرٍ وَالْحَارِثِ عَنْ عَلِيٍّ وَقَدْ رَوَى زَائِدَةُ بْنُ قُدَامَةَ وَغَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ عَنْ خَالِدِ بْنِ عَلْقَمَةَ عَنْ عَبْدِ خَيْرٍ عَنْ عَلِيٍّ رضى الله عنه حَدِيثَ الْوُضُوءِ بِطُولِهِ . وَهَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ . قَالَ وَرَوَى شُعْبَةُ هَذَا الْحَدِيثَ عَنْ خَالِدِ بْنِ عَلْقَمَةَ فَأَخْطَأَ فِي اسْمِهِ وَاسْمِ أَبِيهِ فَقَالَ مَالِكُ بْنُ عُرْفُطَةَ عَنْ عَبْدِ خَيْرٍ عَنْ عَلِيٍّ . قَالَ وَرُوِيَ عَنْ أَبِي عَوَانَةَ عَنْ خَالِدِ بْنِ عَلْقَمَةَ عَنْ عَبْدِ خَيْرٍ عَنْ عَلِيٍّ . قَالَ وَرُوِيَ عَنْهُ عَنْ مَالِكِ بْنِ عُرْفُطَةَ مِثْلَ رِوَايَةِ شُعْبَةَ وَالصَّحِيحُ خَالِدُ بْنُ عَلْقَمَةَ .
Abd Khair related a narration similar to that of Abu Hayyah, :from Ali (no. 48). Except that Abd Khair's version includes the following additions: "When he was finished from his purification, he would take what was left over from his purification with his hand to drink it
Scholarly Authentication
The label above is the grade most of these scholars gave, each scholar counted once — one dissenting opinion no longer speaks for all of them. If any scholar calls a narration fabricated, that verdict is shown instead, whatever the others say. When they judged only its chain of narrators (“Isnaad”), the label says “Sound chain”. Each scholar's own wording:
Our source also lists this ruling under Ahmad Muhammad Shakir, the editor of the printed edition it was taken from. It is al-Albani's ruling printed again, so it is counted once.
In-book reference: 1:49