Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1360

جامع الترمذي#1360Da'if

حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ حُجْرٍ، أَخْبَرَنَا سُوَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ، عَنْ حُمَيْدٍ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ، أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم اسْتَعَارَ قَصْعَةً فَضَاعَتْ فَضَمِنَهَا لَهُمْ ‏.‏ قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى وَهَذَا حَدِيثٌ غَيْرُ مَحْفُوظٍ ‏.‏ وَإِنَّمَا أَرَادَ عِنْدِي سُوَيْدٌ الْحَدِيثَ الَّذِي رَوَاهُ الثَّوْرِيُّ وَحَدِيثُ الثَّوْرِيِّ أَصَحُّ ‏.‏ اسْمُ أَبِي دَاوُدَ عُمَرُ بْنُ سَعْدٍ ‏.‏

Anas narrated that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) borrowed a bowl which broke, so he guaranteed (compensated) it for them

Scholarly Authentication

The label above is the grade most of these scholars gave, each scholar counted once — one dissenting opinion no longer speaks for all of them. If any scholar calls a narration fabricated, that verdict is shown instead, whatever the others say. When they judged only its chain of narrators (“Isnaad”), the label says “Sound chain”. Each scholar's own wording:

Al-AlbaniVery Daif Isnaad
Zubair Ali ZaiDaif

Our source also lists this ruling under Ahmad Muhammad Shakir, the editor of the printed edition it was taken from. It is al-Albani's ruling printed again, so it is counted once.

In-book reference: 15:40