Sunan an-Nasa'i 5707

سنن النسائي#5707Sound chain

أَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو خَيْثَمَةَ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الصَّمَدِ، ‏{‏ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا أَبِي، ‏}‏ عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ جُحَادَةَ، عَنْ إِسْمَاعِيلَ بْنِ أَبِي خَالِدٍ، عَنْ قَيْسِ بْنِ أَبِي حَازِمٍ، عَنْ عُتْبَةَ بْنِ فَرْقَدٍ، قَالَ كَانَ النَّبِيذُ الَّذِي يَشْرَبُهُ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ قَدْ خُلِّلَ ‏.‏ وَمِمَّا يَدُلُّ عَلَى صِحَّةِ هَذَا حَدِيثُ السَّائِبِ ‏.‏

It was narrated that 'Utbah bin Farqad said:"The Nabidh that 'Umar bin Al-Khattab used to drink had turned to vinegar

Scholarly Authentication

The label above is the grade most of these scholars gave, each scholar counted once — one dissenting opinion no longer speaks for all of them. If any scholar calls a narration fabricated, that verdict is shown instead, whatever the others say. When they judged only its chain of narrators (“Isnaad”), the label says “Sound chain”. Each scholar's own wording:

Al-AlbaniSahih Isnaad
Zubair Ali ZaiDaif

Our source also lists this ruling under Abu Ghuddah, the editor of the printed edition it was taken from. It is al-Albani's ruling printed again, so it is counted once.

In-book reference: 51:169