Sunan an-Nasa'i 5198

سنن النسائي#5198Sahih

أَخْبَرَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ خَالِدِ بْنِ خَلِيٍّ الْحِمْصِيُّ، - وَكَانَ أَبُوهُ خَالِدٌ عَلَى قَضَاءِ حِمْصَ - قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا أَبِي قَالَ، حَدَّثَنَا سَلَمَةُ، - وَهُوَ ابْنُ عَبْدِ الْمَلِكِ الْعَوْصِيُّ - عَنِ الْحَسَنِ، - وَهُوَ ابْنُ صَالِحِ بْنِ حَىٍّ - عَنْ عَاصِمٍ، عَنْ حُمَيْدٍ الطَّوِيلِ، عَنْ أَنَسِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ، قَالَ كَانَ خَاتَمُ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم مِنْ فِضَّةٍ وَكَانَ فَصُّهُ مِنْهُ ‏.‏

It was narrated that Anas bin Malik said:"The ring of the Messenger of Allah [SAW] was of silver and its stone (Fass) was made of silver too

Scholarly Authentication

The label above is the grade most of these scholars gave, each scholar counted once — one dissenting opinion no longer speaks for all of them. If any scholar calls a narration fabricated, that verdict is shown instead, whatever the others say. When they judged only its chain of narrators (“Isnaad”), the label says “Sound chain”. Each scholar's own wording:

Al-AlbaniSahih
Zubair Ali ZaiSahih

Our source also lists this ruling under Abu Ghuddah, the editor of the printed edition it was taken from. It is al-Albani's ruling printed again, so it is counted once.

In-book reference: 48:159