Sahih Muslim 3160
صحيح مسلم#3160Sahihوَحَدَّثَنَاهُ عَبْدُ بْنُ حُمَيْدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَكْرٍ، ح وَحَدَّثَنِي سَعِيدُ بْنُ يَحْيَى الأُمَوِيُّ، حَدَّثَنِي أَبِي جَمِيعًا، عَنِ ابْنِ جُرَيْجٍ، بِهَذَا الإِسْنَادِ أَمَّا رِوَايَةُ ابْنِ بَكْرٍ فَكَرِوَايَةِ عِيسَى إِلاَّ قَوْلَهُ لِهَؤُلاَءِ الثَّلاَثِ . فَإِنَّهُ لَمْ يَذْكُرْ ذَلِكَ وَأَمَّا يَحْيَى الأُمَوِيُّ فَفِي رِوَايَتِهِ حَلَقْتُ قَبْلَ أَنْ أَنْحَرَ نَحَرْتُ قَبْلَ أَنْ أَرْمِيَ . وَأَشْبَاهَ ذَلِكَ .
This hadith has been narrated on the authority of Ibn Juraij with the same chain of transmitters. And the narration of Ibn Bakr is like one transmitted by 'Isa but with this (variation):" There are not these words in it: To all these three rites (throwing of pebbles sacrificing of animal and shaving of one's head)." And so far as the narration of Yahya al-Umawi (the words are): I got (my head) shaved before I sacrificed the animal, and I sacrified the animal before throwing pebbles, and like that
Scholarly Authentication
The label above is the grade most of these scholars gave — one dissenting opinion no longer speaks for all of them. If any scholar calls a narration fabricated, that verdict is shown instead, whatever the others say. Each scholar's own wording:
Every narration in Sahih Muslim is accepted as Sahih (authentic) by the established status of the book.
In-book reference: 15:364